About us
English
AI Note Taker And Summarizer
Capture and condense ideas with the ai note taker and summarizer for clear, actionable notes
AI powered (Demo)
1
Add a file
Drop in anything you'd like to use.
OR TRY WITH A SAMPLE
2
Pick a prompt
Add a file first — then any prompt runs against it.
By using the product, you agree to our Terms of Service and have read our Privacy Policy.
Trusted by Millions Worldwide
4.4
2,100+ reviews on G2
4.4
8,200+ reviews on Capterra
4.4
73,000+ reviews on App Store
248M
Registered Users
5B
Notes Created
2M
Notes Created Daily
Frequently Asked Questions
An AI note taker automatically captures and summarizes spoken or written content into structured notes. It listens to meetings or processes documents, extracts key points and action items, and presents condensed summaries that are searchable and editable within Evernote.
Summarization combines extractive and abstractive techniques: extractive methods pick the most relevant sentences, while abstractive models rephrase content into concise text. Many practical systems use a hybrid pipeline to balance fidelity and readability for notes.
Yes. The AI note taker can detect and surface action items, assign owners, and suggest deadlines when available. Outputs are presented as editable action lists so you can confirm or adjust assignments inside Evernote.
Summaries include provenance markers and a toggle to view the original text. That makes it easy to drill down into the source paragraph for full context when needed, preserving traceability between the summary and the original note content.
Default length depends on note type: short blurbs (1-2 sentences) for quick scans, and longer summaries (80-150 words) for detailed meeting notes. You can usually adjust length preferences in settings or request a shorter/longer version in the assistant chat.
Yes. Evernote presents summaries as editable text blocks so you can refine wording, correct assignments, and save the edited version back into the note. Edits help the system learn your preferences and make future summaries more helpful.
The AI supports incremental summarization for very long notes by first extracting key sections and then producing condensed overviews. For extremely long files, it may generate multiple tiered summaries (short, medium, long) to match different reading needs.
Yes. When you provide meeting audio or notes, the assistant can generate minutes that include agenda items, decisions, and a list of action items with suggested owners and deadlines. You can then edit and distribute the minutes from within Evernote.
The AI can process plain text, rich-text notes, and many common document formats. If you upload other formats, Evernote will extract text where possible and run summarization on the extracted content.
The system supports multiple languages and can detect language automatically in many cases. Coverage varies by language; for some languages the summarization may be more extractive to preserve accuracy while models mature.
Yes. You can ask follow-up questions in the assistant chat to expand sections, extract timelines, or clarify references. The assistant uses the content of the notes to provide targeted answers and can produce different output formats on request.
Summaries and generated action items are saved directly into your Evernote notes and linked to notebooks and tags for easy organization. This helps you keep AI outputs discoverable alongside your other project materials.
Accuracy depends on content clarity. The AI does well when sentences explicitly state tasks and owners. When ownership or deadlines are ambiguous, the assistant will suggest candidates and invite confirmation so you can correct or accept the suggestions.
You can often choose summary length, tone (concise vs. detailed), and whether to include action items or provenance. These preferences can be set during a session or saved as defaults for future summaries.
Limitations include potential omissions in very noisy or poorly structured notes, sensitivity to ambiguous ownership in meeting transcripts, and varying performance across languages. Practical mitigations include editable summaries, provenance links, and human validation for critical outputs.